How better charging education could lift EV owner satisfaction, loyalty

Home charging continues to anchor the electric vehicle ownership experience, but rising electricity costs and limited education are weighing on owner satisfaction, according to the J.D. Power 2026 U.S. Electric Vehicle Experience (EVX) Home Charging Study.

J.D. Power said about 86 per cent of typical EV charging happens at home, making it a critical factor in overall ownership satisfaction and future brand loyalty. The study found that satisfaction among owners using Level 1 portable chargers fell to 569 on a 1,000‑point scale, down 12 points from a year earlier. Satisfaction with Level 2 portable chargers slipped four points to 710, while satisfaction with Level 2 permanently mounted home chargers held steady at 733, the highest of the three segments.

Many owners could reduce costs and improve convenience through better use of scheduling features and utility incentive programs, but education remains limited, J.D. Power noted. Only about 20 per cent of EV owners said they received any guidance on home charging from their dealer at the time of purchase.

“Charging costs for EV owners are climbing, and there are several options out there for managing those costs through utility incentive programs and optimization of charging schedules during off‑peak hours, yet only about 20 per cent of owners say they received any kind of education or advice on home charging from their purchasing dealer,” said Brent Gruber, executive director of the EV practice at JD Power.

He added that automakers, dealers and utilities all have a role to play in helping owners understand incentives, rate structures and the benefits of upgrading to Level 2 permanently mounted chargers, which offer more advanced scheduling capabilities.

Scheduling appears to have a clear payoff. More than one‑third of owners, 38 per cent, said they always schedule charging at home. Their average satisfaction score was 734, compared with 706 among those who sometimes schedule charging and 700 among those who never do. Scheduled charging also helped reduce costs. Owners who always scheduled charging during off‑peak hours spent an average of $65 in the past 30 days, compared with $71 among those who never scheduled charging.

Participation in smart charging programs remains low. While 69 per cent of EV owners are aware of utility‑run smart charging options, only 12 per cent said they are enrolled. Just half of home‑charging owners said their utility offers variable rates or incentives based on time of use. Wider adoption of smart charging could help owners manage costs while giving utilities more flexibility to balance demand, J.D. Power said.

Level 2 permanently mounted chargers continue to post the highest satisfaction, but they also generate the most issues. JD Power recorded 44.2 problems per 100 chargers for permanently mounted units, up 5.2 year over year. The higher problem rate reflects their more advanced features, including Wi‑Fi connectivity, mobile apps and smart charging functions. Despite those issues, owners reported greater satisfaction because they are more engaged in scheduling, monitoring and optimizing charging.

Among permanently mounted Level 2 chargers, Tesla ranked highest for the sixth consecutive year with a score of 771. Emporia ranked second at 761, followed by ClipperCreek at 760. J.D. Power observed that the findings highlight the importance of home charging satisfaction in shaping the overall EV experience. With most charging occurring at home, better education, smarter use of technology and clearer guidance from dealers and manufacturers could help owners manage rising costs and improve long‑term loyalty.

Image credit: Depositphotos.com