Executive of California Aftermarket Auto Lights Distributor Agrees to Plead Guilty in Price-Fixing Conspiracy

WASHINGTON – An executive of a U.S. distributor has agreed to plead guilty and serve jail time for his participation in a global conspiracy to fix the prices of aftermarket auto lights, the Department of Justice announced today. This is the first charge in the department’s ongoing investigation into the aftermarket auto lights industry. Aftermarket auto lights are incorporated into an automobile after its original sale, often as repairs following a collision or as accessories and upgrades.

 

According to the one-count felony charge filed today in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, Polo Shu-Sheng Hsu conspired with others to suppress and eliminate competition by fixing the prices of aftermarket auto lights. Hsu, a former president and chief executive officer of a U.S. distributor for a Taiwan producer of aftermarket auto lights, participated in the conspiracy from on or about April 2000 to on or about Sept. 3, 2008.

 

According to the charge, Hsu and co-conspirators participated in a conspiracy in which the participants met and agreed to charge prices of aftermarket auto lights at certain predetermined levels. The participants in the conspiracy issued price announcements and price lists in accordance with the agreements reached, and collected and exchanged information on prices and sales of aftermarket auto lights for the purpose of monitoring and enforcing adherence to the agreed-upon prices. The department charged that the conspirators met in Taiwan, the United States and elsewhere for their discussions.

 

Under his plea agreement, which is subject to court approval, Hsu has agreed to serve six months in jail, to pay a $25,000 criminal fine and to assist the department in its ongoing investigation into the aftermarket auto lights industry.

 

Hsu is charged with violating the Sherman Act, which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $1 million fine for individuals. The maximum fine may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims, if either of those amounts is greater than the statutory maximum fine.